The attorney could make a lot more money off of you by sticking with an hourly rate than he could by doing a contingency fee; injury attorneys would love to take on a case on a per-hour basis. I am assuming the reason you went to an attorney in the first place was because you didn t feel you were getting the proper compensation for your injuries. Insurance companies are never going to give you what you deserve unless you re going through an attorney because they know that you, as a common citizen, do not know the law and what your case would be worth to a jury of your peers. Going through an attorney is actually a good thing in cases like these. If he looked at your case and took you on, he definitely thinks it has potential; med mal cases are extremely costly, and no attorney is going to try one unless it has merit. If you re dissatisfied with your attorney, contact him. Ask for copies of all correspondence that goes out, and get a status update. He s not charging you by the hour, and his number one priority is you. Ask him where things are standing as far as negotiations. Attorneys cannot make settlement decisions or file suit without your consent, so it is likely that the offending medical provider was saying you have a lawsuit against her because you hired an attorney. If they refuse to negotiate with you and will not offer what you deserve, it will likely need to go into litigation. That doesn t mean it WON T settle, but it might give the defense a push in the direction toward settling since that is much cheaper. Don t keep an attorney you don t trust. While most of them are looking out for your best interest, there are some bad apples (and that s why lawyers are so hated, because of the bad examples). Contact him directly, or his assistant if he s not in, and ask what s going on. Ask for copies of documents, and see what s expected of you. If you re getting a bad vibe, find someone else to take on your case. But with a med mal issue, I strongly recommend an attorney. You will not get what you deserve without one.
From what I have seen ,they are all crooked as the day is long.Good luck finding one that is really on your side,and will stay on top of things.They just want your money .
First, if a lawsuit was initiated without your approval, it would be legal malpractice (assuming you were hurt somehow) and actionable through a bar complaint as well. You can check by calling the court. Second, settlement negotiations will not be very effective unless you do sue, because the threat of a suit is just speculation. Third, it is best if both a lawsuit and settlement negotiation time line proceed concurrently. Fourth, the number one complaint levied to bar associations by clients is a failure by the attorney to adequately inform the client. Your attorney is your agent, you tell him how it is going to be, he can control trial tactics and that is all, he cannot tell you what is best for you, YOU ARE THE BOSS. If you don t like him fire him and lodge a bar complaint. Write a complaint to him and if he does not respond in a timely and adequate manner consult your local bar association about making a complaint. Last, never trust the grapevine, that s how good relationships end.
0 comments:
Post a Comment